The caretaker was approach in April 2022 from the owner of Lot 27.
We sought clarification from the body corporate representative
the body corporate representative response, was to send a private emails between the owner of lot 27 and lot 42 , that has been sent to her. There is not indication that Mr Wurth was giving advice from the committee. There was not evidence that any consultation was made with the body corporate manager or any legal advice.the body corporate representative gives recommendation on the advice from Mr Wurth and her belief that it has “happened in the past”.
Then on the 5th May the secretary sent an email
Then the treasure followed with an email on the same day
And on the following day, from another lot owner who was friends with Ora and Lynen, to the extend that she put in motions to support the body corporate representative in her dispute with the chair person.
Then a few days later another request was made from a committee member
At the committee meeting on the 11th May 202, the caretaker report the advice of Lynne Smith but is was mispresented in the minutes as being her advice that she denies was the statement she made.
Noting that this was the only meeting netween the AGM of 2021 and 2022 that the caretaker was allowed to attend.
The caretaker believes that less than 10 people requested screen